Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42
the court ruling was not about Brexit it was about pm unlawfully proroguing parliament
makes me laugh leavers like you OB crying parliament was not sovereign then crying about parliament proving it was sovereign all the time
|
I didn't say anything to the contrary. I was comparing the comments people were making about Boris's behaviour with the behaviour of Parliament in doing all it can to ditch Brexit.
---------- Post added at 16:38 ---------- Previous post was at 16:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
A concise summing up of Mr Blobby's record so far from Ms Kuenssberg:-
In his two months in power, Boris Johnson has lost his first six Commons votes, broken the law by suspending Parliament and misled the monarch.
Hope he's not on performance pay....
|
So what? Boris wants to implement the will of the electorate, and the lost votes simply reflect his lack of a majority for getting that through.
You can't blame the man for trying (although no doubt, you will).
I would like to ask why these last few weeks are so important for having Parliamentary debates when it is self evident that three years of debating has got us nowhere, except to prove that Parliament won't agree any solution that is put to them. What a waste of time. Now the Labour Party Conference will have to be cut short and the Conservative Party Conference postponed.
Absolutely insane.
---------- Post added at 16:41 ---------- Previous post was at 16:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
So going forward is there now a legal limit on the number of days in a prorogation ?
|
No, it is the impact of the prorogation that will be important, although the amount of time involved, inevitably, will form part of the assessment.