View Single Post
Old 21-09-2019, 19:18   #297
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,440
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
The backstop isn't remotely connected to movement of people. By the same token, goods could be shipped into the UK from the EU, but not go on to another EU country. That would break the UK internal market, in the SAME way as the EU complains the EU single market could be broken.
Link

Link
That's a problem for the EU to find a solution for.
It’s called an analogy. I framed it in terms easier for you to understand.

You’ve denoted a risk there that could be picked up by border checks - which is why the backstop is necessary to prevent a hard border. That’s literally the whole point.

The UK could, for example, conduct random exit checks.

That’s not the same as an open border leaking products into the EU.
jfman is online now