Thread: UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal
View Single Post
Old 19-09-2019, 20:48   #235
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,247
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
Suspected you would, although I agree he should have dropped it when he realised he was wrong.
Agreed.

---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
That is a key aspect of the government’s case. Parliament has legislated on certain aspects of prorogation, but it has never legislated on this issue. Therefore there is, deliberately, no law here - only political judgement. This is non-justiciable.

I suspect their lordships are going to choose not to intervene here, except perhaps to point out that parliament could, and probably should, legislate in this area. That is the ruling already reached by two of the three courts that have heard the case.
Good summary.
1andrew1 is offline