Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
If it was clear with a definition of what leave meant
|
How many times does it need to be explained? A definition of what Leave “ meant” was not asked for and therefore not required. What Leave “ means” is subjective, obviously.
But “leave” itself is not subjective. Which is what Johnson is saying.
We leave, no matter what, no matter what way.
Quote:
|
It was ambiguous which led the Conservative Party to negotiate internally for two years before even negotiating with the EU.
|
Ball cocks......there is nothing ambiguous about the question on the ballot sheet.
Politicians have subsequently tried very hard and successfully to make it and ambiguous, but the question was yes or no, nothing ambiguous about that.
---------- Post added at 18:33 ---------- Previous post was at 18:32 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
So it’s not the biggest mandate, except where you redefine it to remove larger mandates for arbitrary reasons?
Very Brexit. We’ve had enough of experts.
|
Sorry, do those words make a point in your head?
---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
And could you image the outrage if Cameron prorogued Parliament to push through joining the Euro and becoming part of the Schengen Area, stating "it was in or out, you knew what you were voting for"?
|
Yes, but we have to imagine that, as it hasn’t happened........................