Thread: Brexit
View Single Post
Old 27-06-2019, 12:28   #3704
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,083
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx View Post
Article 28 requires agreement (or more accurately, absence of dispute) of all WTO members for a country to enact a change in their tariff and quota schedule. Changing it regardless of objections would be a break in the rules. As I understand it, it's the split of Tariff Relief Quotas between the UK and EU which are causing the most objections.

---------- Post added at 11:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:49 ----------



The issue is that the current status will not be carried on, even by dint that the size of the market would change from 508 million to 66 million and the balance of good domestically produced will change after leaving.

Here's the formal letter of objection to the UK and EU on the proposed TRQ schedule - https://iegpolicy.agribusinessintell...9A819C09FE2C6E
Thank you for that information, jonbxx. However, it seems to me that the UK could come up with a solution that satisfies the objectors.
OLD BOY is offline