Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
We can keep coming to this old argument again and again and I certainly knew which Brexit I wanted, it wasn't described before Brexit, as hard or soft, nor was is half in, half out. When I expect to leave something, that means exactly that.
I fear nothing - but I do not want my country to be associated or connected to any United States of Europe, which is what the EU has repeatedly aspired to become. But the EU is not a Democratic institution, it certainly expects it's members to follow their way and if we vote on something they don't like, they want us to keep on voting until they get the result they want. Why on Earth do Remainers want to be associated with such corruption and disgusting antics from the EU... They keep saying we should stay and reform, the EU don't want to reform, they made that crystal clear to David Cameron when he tried.
Our democracy is far more better than this, or at least it should be, we should grow a backbone and leave the EU.
|
Hi Mick.
Thats my point, because it was never explicitly defined as to what leaving the EU entails then everyone's interpretation of what leave means is correct.
It's the governments (at the time) fault for failing to define the parameters of what leave actually meant and would happen.
I have my reasons why i want to remain, you have your reasons for wanting to leave and never the twain shall meet, however, it doesn't make either of our reasons any less valid
---------- Post added at 15:37 ---------- Previous post was at 15:34 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Those that think No Deal is the only acceptable Brexit are frustrated by MPs who know this would be the worst version. The majority of MPs are not blocking Brexit, just blocking No Deal Brexit.
What they cannot agree on, is what sort of negotiated Brexit to accept.
|
Not true, they've blocked no deal Brexit and they've blocked May's version of Brexit (three times now)