Thread: Brexit
View Single Post
Old 24-03-2019, 20:20   #537
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,621
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Brexit (New).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
UKIP did enough to force a referendum, The BNP & UKIP which you would describe as far right outdid LibDems in many constituencies and in local elections did even better.

To discount this as an MP’s numbers game would be very foolish. Parliament and the establishment ignored this threat and feeling and what did we get? Brexit.

To ignore this shows you are as out if touch in your ivory tower as most of Westminster.

It’s Hilarious.

Westminster and the Establishment facilitated this fiasco by ignoring large swathes of the electorate that had valid concerns, concerns that were preyed upon by UKIP and the far right.

And now after the result how do they intend to adress those concerns? By ignoring the electorate. Stupid is as stupid does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Nothing says someone is secure in their proposition as much as an ad hominem attack...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
I’d be happy to have another referendum based on the exact same question.

---------- Post added at 16:24 ---------- Previous post was at 16:23 ----------



I still wouldn’t bet the farm.

---------- Post added at 16:27 ---------- Previous post was at 16:24 ----------



Yeah I must really come across as insecure. Jesus , you class that as an attack!? Some really sensitive souls on this forum.

It is a widely used phrase that implies the person it is directed at is out of touch, which is what your post previous certainly evidenced. It’s not an attack, get over yourself. Also it was not “ad hominem” I did not avoid the topic of the discussion or try to evade a reply to you. If you’re going to use clever words make sure you know what they mean.
Quote:
Ad Hominem

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline