Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
None of these things were specifically stated on the ballot paper, so you’ve no way to quantify which (if any) need to be delivered.
|
Give over, it is implicit in the term of no longer being in the European Union. Is a party’s manifesto on the ballot paper?
No longer being a member of the EU meant.
Exiting the single market,
Exiting the customs union,
Exiting the four freedoms associated with the single market
No longer being subject to ECJ
The above is what was put to British people, everything since the result has been obfuscate the above.
And people trying to be clever and say (Whiney voice) “it wasn’t on the ballot paper”. We it was.
All this talk in the last two years saying that the type of Brexit wasn’t on the ballot paper has Just been a smokescreen by the MPs to stop Brexit, and guess what, they may do.
---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:29 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
It’s because it wasn’t what the public wanted!
|
Was that on the ballot paper?
---------- Post added at 13:32 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
It wasn’t really confusion over funding. The party came up with one of its most progressive policies ever and their voters said no. Capitalists in life wanting a socialist death.
|
Strange how Labour were against it then?
---------- Post added at 13:34 ---------- Previous post was at 13:32 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
If it was the right strategy then we would not be where we are standing now with the constant internecine warfare in the governing party which could result in Theresa May having to face a delegation from the 1922 Committee in these coming weeks.
|
She’s would have needed a majority large enough to out vote the ERG and all the other parties, bar a few Labour Brexiteers, those kind of numbers were never possible.