Looks like the speaker theoretically has the power to reject meaningless - sorry meaningful - vote No. 3.
Quote:
On paper, the principle is actually quite clear. According to the Commons' rule book "Erskine May", there is a clear precedent that a matter, once decided upon by MPs, cannot be considered again in the same session of parliament (which usually lasts a year - this current session has gone on for longer and will expire in the summer).
Buried deep within on page 397, there lies: "A motion or an amendment which is the same, in substance, as a question which has been decided during a session may not be brought forward again during that same session."
|
https://news.sky.com/story/an-ancien...rexit-11664555