|
Re: Brexit
Hillary Benn just asked a question as to whether the European Court of Justice would have a say in the interpretation of these “legally binding changes” affecting any ruling of an arbitration panel. The answer didn’t console John Redwood.
---------- Post added at 22:47 ---------- Previous post was at 22:37 ----------
The Government motion tomorrow says: “which reduces the risk the UK could be deliberately held in the Northern Ireland backstop indefinitely”.
Does it reduce the risk or eliminate it? If the latter why is more vague terminology being put before the House?
|