|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Westminster council are saying that, up until just over a year ago, they, the police and immigration officials could move them on or send them home. They say that since this EU ruling all that they can do is ask them to go home. This rarely achieves the desired result.
The relevant section of the programme explains this, i'm sure that if what you are saying was doable that they'd use this to achieve their aims.
---------- Post added at 14:25 ---------- Previous post was at 14:24 ----------
That's out of date eg it talks about 2014 as a future point in time.
Scrapping freedom of movement need not affect anyone wanting to come here to do hard to fill vacancies or to work in skill shortage areas. It's their right to come here that is so objectionable.
|
Which EU ruling?
Watching the programme, it was the English High Court that decided it was against the EU Freedom of Movement rules, not the EU.
Quote:
|
Her ruling found the practice unlawful on three grounds, including by allowing banned “systematic verification” – effectively sweeping for people to deport without reasonable grounds.
|
The Danish still remove foreign rough sleepers, and they were willing to share their legislation with London (as shown in the programme).
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 05-03-2019 at 15:32.
|