Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
My wisdom tells me it’s impossible for you to speak for 17 million people, and that despite it not being stated on the ballot paper you know exactly what they understood ‘leaving’ to mean.
If ‘leave’ means one thing, and one only, why does the Theresa May deal not fit the bill for some yet it does for others? Why does it not fit Liam Fox’s easiest deal in history? Leave has a very broad range of outcomes that all fall under one umbrella.
You understand what you want from leaving. That’s not the same as everyone understanding, let alone agreeing over it.
|
Ha ha! I don't, and you don't speak for them either, so no more talk of leavers not knowing what they voted for!
As for Liam Fox, the withdrawal agreement has been pretty straight forward considering the extent of the voices off from the remainers. Only the backstop is getting in the way, but other than that, the withdrawal agreement is just about there.
The other types of leave you envisage do not actually mean 'leave' - they mean a half way house. This is unacceptable to most leavers.
Can you tell me, with supporting evidence if you like, what it is that leavers did not understand?
---------- Post added at 19:12 ---------- Previous post was at 19:11 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
We will also be a rule taker in a trade deal with the USA!
|
You are such a defeatest in everything you touch! Thank God you are not leading us, old chap.
---------- Post added at 19:13 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42
exactly with no say in it at all as they have all the power in the talks but leavers don't get that in EU we get a say on the rules but we wont have for much longer
|
No deal is better than a bad deal, Dave!