[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by ianch99

<SNIP>

In Parliament, agreed but we assume that the said vote is made on a bill that has been planned, defined and debated.

The same for the Referendum is a false equivalence. There was no plan, no details, no written process, the opposite in fact. [SEPH]: There were months of public debate before the Referendum; the ballot sheet was the written process and was quite clear and unambiguous.

There is no "struggle" here for a valid argument. I already have one and have (tried to) articulate why it is so. You just don't agree. History is littered with nations making, in hindsight, bad decisions via plebiscite. This just adds another to the list . [SEPH]: In your opinion. A margin of 1 million disagree with you.