Quote:
Originally Posted by Mythica
It's all freely available in the press and has been spoke about plenty of times before. I'm not avoiding anything, just don't want to be brought into that argument.
|
You don’t want to be brought into the argument?
You’re making the argument ............( or rather you’re not) failing and looking very foolish.
You can’t back up your assertion. You’ve been asked several times to back it up, but you refuse instead telling us to google it.
It seems you can’t be arsed to google it either to back up your own statement, ( but i bet secretly you did, but couldn’t Find anything)
Quote:
|
Some people want a second referendum which is fact. My point of talking about this is it's not undemocratic to want one.
|
No, but you say they want one because there is “ new information “ out there that wasn’t there before the first referendum.
So what is the new information, it’s a simple request and if this info is all over the web it shouldn’ Be easy to copy and paste, so what’s the problem?
---------- Post added at 19:18 ---------- Previous post was at 19:15 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Oh really ?
When team members issue an instruction, you do not argue, ever.
To everyone else - this discussion on whether A second referendum is Democratic or not, needs to move on - we've been on this now for several pages.
Time to draw a line under this particular avenue of debate, it is quite clear people do not agree either way. We really need to step away from divisive arguments where there is quite clearly no chance of a consensus.
And a final reminder - people who do not follow team instructions, there is still time to be added to Paul's Xmas holiday list. (Being added = Account time out until after the new year).  |
Sorry, I posted before I read this.
Just asking someone to back up their statements, but they won’t so you’re right, i’ll Leave it. They’re the ones that look daft.