Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I’m quite sure the search function would help you, and any new entrants to the thread, identify my stance. You raised no new meaningful points and I decided to save us from the circular arguments around Brexit as a whole.
If you must I’ll go disagree disagree disagree disagree.
|
You are truly pathetic.
3no. Simple questions.
1. Was the version of Brexit promoted before the referendum by all the pro-Remain players, including the Government, what we would call a hard Brexit? Yes/no?
2. You complain that brexiteers claim this would be the easiest trade deal ever and why haven’t they delivered it. Yet the trade deal isn’t up for discussion yet. It is the withdrawal deal we are currently negotiating and voting over. Yes/no?
3. You claim that that MPs are only held to account every 5 years, and pretty much they can say and do what they want inbetween, and deliver sod all, As if they fail we can get rid after that term.
But we can’t wait and see if brexit is delivered, live it for a few years and decide or not If we like it?
For you we have to determine this before the outcome has been realised or lived up through, which goes against all of that. Yes/no?
---------- Post added at 23:12 ---------- Previous post was at 23:11 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Amber “newly promoted” Rudd has a lot of opinions. You’d think they’d have measured the chances of this happening before appointing her. Unless they did...  |
Another “Stupid Women” is she?