Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42
[/B]
there a chance it will be after deal get defeated in parliament you must admit there a chance it will be
|
I see no reason why Theresa May needs to put any further votes to Parliament if the Withdrawal Agreement is voted down. Just let the no-deal Brexit happen. The legislation is already passed and Article 50 is in place.
It was Theresa May's idea to have this bridge between membership and non-membership. Parliament either accepts it or they don't.
---------- Post added at 07:45 ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I think there does seem to be a change in rhetoric as jfman has highlighted. I definitely had not heard no Brexit being mentioned by the Government until recently. Whether this is a case of promoting the current deal to Brexit MPs as "May's deal or no Brexit" (and to Remain MPs as "May's deal or a no-deal Brexit") or whether there's something more substantive behind it, I don't know.
On another note, popcorn tomorrow, folks! In the afternoon, Geoffrey Cox, the attorney-general, will give his statement on the government's legal advice on the withdrawal agreement.
|
I don't see 'no Brexit' as an option. As you intimate, this threat was aimed at the 'hard' Brexiteers.
Before May's idea about a transitional arrangement, most people just thought we would be leaving, full stop. So if the Withdrawal Agreement doesn't pass, we are just back to our original expectations.
The Withdrawal Agreement has certainly succeeded in muddying the waters, but it hasn't reduced the enthusiasm of those who voted to leave.