Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Who is this aimed at ?
|
Nobody specifically.
I was referencing the only cataclysm that would result from the status quo being the reaction of those who feel passionately against it.
I don't believe this reaction would be physical in the form of civil disobedience or protests.
I apologise if anyone interpreted that differently.
---------- Post added at 21:29 ---------- Previous post was at 21:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
You’re doing it again.....
Who are you quoting?
No one has said that, you’ve made up a quote by nobody and are then using it for your argument.
|
You may not have used the exact words, but your intent is that this gives us strength in the negotiations. I've used a turn of phrase in quotation marks that I wouldn't ordinarily use.
Are you now making the contention that you didn't mean that this gives us a significant negotiating advantage?
Your actual words: "The EU (and it’s members that rely on this trade) will not stand by and see pissed in the wind."