Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Contract is with the customer, not a house 
Anyway, seems the courts take a dim view of VMs practices. |
Is it or is the contract linked to the address the services were installed.
---------- Post added at 09:35 ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Well, it's VM's fault if they aren't able to supply services at the new address by cable or ADSL.
Many people move simply because they have no choice e.g. their house is being repossessed, their Housing Benefit has been cut, their assured shorthold tenancy has come to an end or their landlord has given them notice to quit.
When looking at new properties, I think that whether VM can service them will be well below more important matters like the crime rate, what the schools are like etc.
|
You can't blame a company for not having 100% coverage across the country. People also have a choice not to sign a 12 month contract.