Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I wouldn't be optimistic that the market for streaming services will sustain a number of providers on top of those that are already there.
There has to come a maximum, and whether there's enough space for everyone to make profits at the level they currently do I'd say is questionable.
---------- Post added at 23:43 ---------- Previous post was at 23:37 ----------
I'm still yet to see the benefits.
People who can't afford a Now TV subscription might be able to buy a separate inferior service just to qualify as having pay-tv?
I'm 100% certain if I had to pay separate subscriptions to see the content I do now from Sky, Viacom, Disney, etc. There wouldn't be massive injections of cash into the market from people who don't currently subscribe to pay-tv. They'd all be fighting for the same small pot outside the existing subscriber bases.
|
Er, let's look at this again!
Are you seriously suggesting that a subscription to Now TV is more expensive than to Sky satellite or Virgin Media?
I'm sorry, but I just do not understand your logic!