Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
According to you and you aren't privy to the materials they are. We don't conduct criminal investigations by the opinions of the internet. If there is no collusion then there is no harm in letting the investigation continue. However the person who is connected, if not a subject, of an investigation having the power to shut it down is very dodgy. Hence why Sessions recused himself in the first place.
Put it this way. If there was an investigation into the Clinton Foundation under a President Clinton and she shut it down because there was no crime would you think that is fair?
|
Let’s just go back to President Bill Clinton, he was guilty of all sorts, as he got impeached in the House and acquitted in the Senate, at the time because every Democrat Senator stood by him even though he was very guilty of serious crimes and misdemeanours.
The Russian investigation is a sham.
And Yes I am privy to the info, as are you. The info was released early in year. This is not “internet information” that you’re classing it as, this is material released by congress.