Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Dominic Raab wrote a letter indicating that 21 November was the expected date for a deal. But this was withdrawn just three hours later. https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-raab-suggests
---------- Post added at 17:17 ---------- Previous post was at 17:11 ----------
Just to add a bit of flavour to Chris's post. My original post was a reflective piece on how we should react if it was found that Arron Banks was found guilty. It opened by stating that Brexit negotiations should continue. It was not a run-of-the mill "We need a referendum post.
I do think that any potential interference in the democratic process by a hostile state is a concern and we need to be thoughtful about how we tackle it.
Business is worried about Brexit on many fronts. |
You just cannot help yourself can you?
You really want him to be guilty, even though he states that he wants his day in court to clear his name as he denies all accusations from the Remainers in the EC. I call them Remainers because they have taken a blind eye to the £9 Million the government spent on the Remain propaganda leaflet they sent to every household in Britain - that should NEVER have been allowed, pretty much like President Obama with his back of queue threat, which we then learn that he was just following a diplomatic request from then Prime Minister, David Cameron.
So what if Arron Banks may or may have not committed offences - the Remain side is just as, if not more complicit in heavy, dodgy influencing and yet, leave still won despite the Remain campaign getting a nice boost to it's campaign in the form of that tax payer funded Pro-Remain leaflet.
