View Single Post
Old 17-10-2018, 09:53   #1581
Mick
Cable Forum Team
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua View Post
Then we are back to the problem of a simplistic referendum choice for what has since been discovered is a complex separation. Less than half of those who could vote actively chose either option. Added to which we are still being dictated to by a minority, a minority who voted for the Conservatives to deliver Brexit.
It's only being made complex by people trying to keep us tied to a corrupted union.

And - you're making the mistake of trying to include the entire populace in your argument.

The 2016 EU Referendum was one of the largest Democratic processes undertaken in modern British History.

Those who were entitled to vote, but didn't because they could not be bothered cannot be included in a total percentage argument. There will never be 100% Turn out. Those who chose not to vote, cannot complain after, if they did not agree with the Democratic decision.

A section of the populace are Children, who are quite rightly, not eligible to vote.

There was a snap election almost a year after the referendum. Voters in their millions voted for two parties, who had Manifested their intentions to follow the result of the EU Referendum, some 80% of the total votes cast.

So trying to use misleading statistics to de-legitimise the "Leave" decision, is totally disingenuous and wrong.
Mick is offline