Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
As seen on Twitter, this seems to paraphrase the new migration policy, right?
|
The idea is that if companies cannot get the highly skilled people they need in order to function and be competitive, the new policy won't prevent them from recruiting from overseas.
Given the strength of feeling displayed that immigrants were keeping wages low and stealing working class jobs, this policy, together with new training programmes for the indigenous population, is exactly the right thing to do. Our people will be properly trained and the lack of immigrant labour should increase wages.
As long as the good old British have sufficient motivation to get off their backsides and work for their money, and I'm sure they will

the policy should work.
---------- Post added at 16:47 ---------- Previous post was at 16:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Linking migration to salary is a stupid idea. It is biased towards London where salaries would be higher so a programmer in London could be deemed essentially whereas a programmer in Leeds would not. It would mean nurses aren't deemed vital for migration.
|
The reason wages and salaries are more expensive in London is the shortage of local labour.
---------- Post added at 16:49 ---------- Previous post was at 16:47 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx
How about an immigration system where you can come here if you have a job. If you do not have a job, you must be wholly self supporting including comprehensive health insurance?
|
How will this address the issue that was so often raised at the referendum that immigrants were stealing lower paid jobs and pushing wage levels down?