Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Strange comment. I was just correcting a previous post. I didn't say that I believed Rees-Mogg's prediction, or any other prediction
|
OB, you are constantly saying that Brexit will be fine, we will prosper, etc. with nothing tangible to underwrite the claim. Yet when someone says that we will suffer under the current plans, you say "I think these forecasters are simply making it up as they go along."
You can't have it both ways
---------- Post added at 16:27 ---------- Previous post was at 16:22 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
You need to allow linguistic latitude and be less up-tight. Pierre's post was full of true information and all you're worried about is "hards of thinking". Rather proves the point.
Brexit is about sovereignty and getting away from schemes dreamt up by the Commission that reduce our sovereignty. Any dispute about that invites a "hard of thinking" suggestion. You can always refute that with counter-argument.
|
If someone says I am hard of thinking, I'll reply that they are talking tripe. If that's the level you want the debate to descend to then you need to reassess your approach.