[Chloé Palmas]

Originally Posted by ianch99

I did some quick research and there are a number of articles that provide persuasive evidence that you are not correct on this. Here's one:

4 pieces of evidence showing FBI Director James Comey cost Clinton the election

There are other articles that disagree (as you do) but from what I have read, I think Comey did indeed make the crucial difference.

No, look I don't agree with this one bit purely because the polls I cited carried all the way through election day and predated all the Comey hysteria.

What I predicted, was about 2 months before Comey - based on polling from May ; what Comey did was a week out from the election yet the results were exactly what the polling suggested. Comey had no effect.

There isn't one thing that anyone can say that will ever convince me that James Comey swung this election. I can't stand Anthony Weiner but I wouldn't even go as far as to say that he had anything to do with it - but if it was somebody's fault that the case was re-opened (which in no way effected the race) then the logical step would be to look at the convicted sex offender, no?

James Comey had nothing to do with this election, in any way shape or form.

Nor did the sex offender in Weiner.