Possibly - I will never back off the fact that Comey / the re-opening of the case had anything to do with the result.
This was the prediction (on those said WN states) that Trump carried:
www.elite-politics.com/showthread.php?403-Quinnipiac-poll-numbers-is-Trump-set-to-rise-to-the-finish-line
I haven't got it in me to go through
every single chart and graphic that I cited but Quinnipiac had the result (every state), pegged accurately...months before the vote. Months before Comey.
In fact, WI was not even included in the poll as it was
such slam dunk for Trump. That all had
nothing to do with Comey / re-opening the investigation / Weiner etc.
Hillary lost on the merits and see as blaming Comey has been fruitless, she now blames Russia.
The only time I goaded a nationalist within the time frame of Comey's re-opening of the case was this:
http://www.elite-politics.com/showth...ull=1#post7578
This is what I wrote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chloé
So in the year that the Red Sox finally broke their drought, even then, their candidate from MA (Kerry) couldn't beat Bush (04). This is going to look all the more humiliating for Hillary come next week that even her own Cubs could win a WS and she couldn't beat the worst Presidential candidate the GOP ever put forward. |
That prediction was made on the 3rd of November.
That did not, in any way shape or form come because of the view that James Comey re-opening the Clinton case bore any effect on the outcome of the election.
Comey did not effect that race at all IMO.