|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloé Palmas
When has it ever been, though? In that sense, it is no different with her, just a lot more justified...
In regards to the recordings, a bunch of states have one party recording laws where they are violations unless both parties consent but that (I think) is just for phone calls not just a call spoken in person but I will have to double check / get back to you on that.
After Watergate it did lead to the WPA and what not, but the biggest issue in communication came from within the issue of whether digitized communication differed from in person. Loads of states (20+) have remedied this but at the federal level it never will be as it requires altering / defining the 4th amendment, which will never be done.
|
It’s the fact she took a recording device into the White House Situation Room, which is a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, which is an enclosed area within a building that is used to process Sensitive Compartmented Information types of classified information).
It is illegal to do so (I used to work with GCHQ and NSA, and have friends/colleagues who still do, and they have to leave their phones/tablets outside their place of work (in a secure locker)).
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|