Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
I did intend to try to pass a message on to ask them about any QAM modulation changes to address your point and try to find out if this could be how VM will make more efficient use of their existing limited spectrum but, unfortunately, as a result of your (and a minority of other individuals) comments, the people responsible for collating, analysing and posting this information have decided to withdraw consent for their future findings to be published on internet forums.
I am informed that the scanners 'don't care whether you believe it or not and have pointed out that their information isn't produced for forum users in any case'.
The last piece of information issued for public use was that VM have created an extra block of data channels on frequencies formerly used for DVB-C channels. Why? I've no idea.
The scanners take the view that certain forum users seem 'quite happy to accept the validity of the data when it is bringing them additional information about new channels being added in the background, channels switching between subscription packs etc. They find it rather strange that those forum users don't accept the validity of other changes on the network that, possibly, interfere with the user's fantasy vision of what is happening at VM'.
That is why they have taken the decision not to release any new information on internet forums in the future. I have to say, I can't blame them.
---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:15 ----------
|
So nameless faceless individuals who previously “released” information they thought was unverifiable have, upon being challenged, decided to back away from saying anything.
I for one think that’s a good thing. If it can’t be corroborated it’s unhelpful to have meaningless analysis based upon it, such as your assertion that there is only space for 4 HD channels - a statement verifiably false.