View Single Post
Old 08-08-2018, 22:26   #776
Arthurgray50@blu
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels

I think what the problem is that VM want the best of both world's. UKTV have already stated that VM wanted a cut in what they pay for the channels.

UKTV, are totally within the rights to refuse this.

Look at this scenario. VM put up our subs. IF enough subs said NO, where would VM be.

Its exactly the same.

VM directors want to become richer. But to me they are a waste of space.

It happened several years ago under Telewest. My family used to watch Horizon. But this channel was taken off as Telewest said that viewing figures were low.

TV companies should not be our judges, when we PAY for a service that we deserve
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote