Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
The law seems to cover this but saying it only applies to shots you wouldn't have gotten without sticking the phone under someone's clothes.
|
Which is why it needs proper debate and scrutiny, normally done by their Lordships as they don't need to worry about being reelected and can question questionable bills.
We must be certain that the law covers what it needs to but doesn't also encompass some other factor not thought of at the time of drafting. You can bet that there would be those who would try to wiggle round the law for some reason or those prosecuted for innocently taking a snap at the wrong time/place.