[Chloé Palmas]

Where did I ever say that the leader of the Labour party was laughing at May?

I said it was so bad for the PM, that even her own foreign secretary laughed at Corbyn's joke, which he was the inspiration for.

Now, onto your other points.

Would Corbyn do better? Well, he couldn't do worse, that is for sure. (Though I am not sure where you are translating my loathing of May into support for Corbyn).

Right, now to the issue of how difficult the job is. Simply put : May needs to suck it up. She wants the job of PM (and couldn't do the honorable thing and quit) then she needs to quit whining, grow a pair and be competent at her job. Which she is clearly not. She is woeful. There was an article I read today, about her and who else would be better for the job.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/652427...t-theresa-may/

I'll copy and post of some of the snippets of the article:

CAN you think of anyone who would do a worse job of shepherding this country towards Brexit than Theresa May?

I’ve been thinking about this for a while. So far all I’ve come up with is Iggle Piggle, from TV’s In The Night Garden.

I think negotiating Brexit would be a stretch for the friendly blue woollen creature with the red Mohawk.

But maybe I’ve got him wrong, underestimated his abilities. He has a bell in his left foot. Theresa May seems to have a brain in her left foot. Given the choice, maybe I’d take the kid with the bell.

This part of it hits the nail on the head:

One moment we’re told the Prime Minister has caved in to their demands. Next minute she hasn’t. Nobody knows quite what to believe.

She is tip-toeing between the two sides solely to stay in power. And she has to be told: It isn’t working. It sends out a message to the people we are negotiating with that we haven’t a clue what’s going on.

This is all she ever does, whores herself out to every single side. One side wants more, she gives. Another side wants more, she goes back to them. Going back on her word, every single time. Why? All for the premise of staying in power. She is a power greedy tramp.

Some will argue May can only play the cards she has been dealt. That she has a minority Government and a split in her own party.

Now, this part is like you, when you say:

I think most of us are speechless at some of these comments, which are frankly naive in the extreme and do not take account of the difficulty of dealing with the lack of a parliamentary majority, dissent within the party in that situation, a hostile EU negotiation process and a host of European countries, each with a different take on the situation

This is difficult - big time, and whatever you might say about Theresa May, she persists, and she is edging us closer to the finishing line by stealth.

You know what your comments remind me of?

The people that John Boehner was making fun of in this clip (the Tea Party):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHSWe81f3yw

Quit whining and crying - now I get it...like with Hillary, you wanted a coronation, didn't you? Diddums...next are you going to tell me that it is sexist for me to blast May and her policies / her stupidity and her incompetence?

When you say

I think most of us are speechless at some of these comments

you are talking about my comments, right?

When she decided to run for the job, did she expect everyone to roll over and just give her what she wanted, just coz? Did she not expect dissent in her party, or did she want a dictatorship? Did she not think that 27 member states would have a different take on the issue?? Did she think that would get this all handed to her on a plate?

Seriously, does she think that she is queen?

As for the lack of a majority in parliament, that is because the people rejected giving her one. She is useless - she had a majority given to her, she chose to do the honorable thing, and allow the electorate to give her a massive "FU". Though instead of resigning, like she should have, she clings on to power like a desperate pathetic little woman.

She gave Brady a recommendation for a knighthood, so she could avoid him calling as the chair of the committee if enough letters came his way, she doesn't persist. She is the dirtiest little piece of filth Westminster has ever seen as PM. She is a beggar and pathetic, she gives any woman who can stomach her a bad name - she is a disgrace to the entire house, to our gender and makes our entire country look stupid round the entire planet.

You don't strike me as the snowflake type but if you would like me to post more in accordance with her pathetic delicate little sensitivities let me know, and I will pretend that all is well in Narnia and just talk as if we are in a fantasy land.

This is why I love people who have principle, because remain or leave voter, you will have no love for this woman. She is someone who will put her finger up in the air and see which way the wind blows, not a genuine bone of anything, in her body.