Cable Forum - View Single Post

Chloé Palmas · 03-06-2018, 18:05

No, I did not mean fetish in a sexual sense. Just deviant, in general. They have a warped way of going about it in SF - though they are not the only ones.

For example through this latest referendum on abortion Mary Lou (new leader of the party) was pregnant. She would go ahead and rub her bump and then go ahead and say that it was a fundamental right of a woman "to chose". She didn't quite have a twinkle in her eye like a disturbing smile or something like Cuomo did but it was perverse.

I mean the publicity stunt of women in the north taking abortafative pills, when not even pregnant - what would you call that if not a fetish? (Not a sexual one, just an unhealthy obsession).

Same with gay marriage - any normal person would have their own views on the matter...for or against. Not them, no. SF think that it must be done with all the pomp and circumstance of explaining to clergy why gay marriage is the norm, say it in church - insist on it as a part of their Christian roots. I don't know what else to call it - intentional antagonism? Attention seeking? OCD?

Same with Ruth Davidson...she was warned time and again that it would cost her party seats in the next election if the Tories brought the gay marriage vote in. Did she listen?

Her basic response was "yes, I do agree that we need more outward aggression towards homosexuality". Then she went off to figure why the Tories got hammered by traditional voters:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...-Election-2017

I don't under any circumstances view your having a fetish on the issue - you are not hell bent on shoving it in the face of other people in an entirely antagonistic way what your views are on the matter. (When unsolicited).

SF though, along with the likes of Davidson / May etc all seem hell bent on trying their level best to get under the skin of those who do hold traditional views.

I honestly don't know what a better word than fetish is, to use. They have some depraved need to seek attention...what word best suits that? It is in no way any reference to someone who may support gay rights though - your average individual will leave it at that. Which is perfectly fine, whichever side you may take.

03-06-2018, 18:05	#23
Chloé Palmas Inactive Join Date: May 2018 Location: Surrey Services: Sky HD (2 TB / 1.5 TB MultiRoom) Sky Fiber Max Posts: 510	Re: Irish referendum on abortion May 25 2018 No, I did not mean fetish in a sexual sense. Just deviant, in general. They have a warped way of going about it in SF - though they are not the only ones. For example through this latest referendum on abortion Mary Lou (new leader of the party) was pregnant. She would go ahead and rub her bump and then go ahead and say that it was a fundamental right of a woman "to chose". She didn't quite have a twinkle in her eye like a disturbing smile or something like Cuomo did but it was perverse. I mean the publicity stunt of women in the north taking abortafative pills, when not even pregnant - what would you call that if not a fetish? (Not a sexual one, just an unhealthy obsession). Same with gay marriage - any normal person would have their own views on the matter...for or against. Not them, no. SF think that it must be done with all the pomp and circumstance of explaining to clergy why gay marriage is the norm, say it in church - insist on it as a part of their Christian roots. I don't know what else to call it - intentional antagonism? Attention seeking? OCD? Same with Ruth Davidson...she was warned time and again that it would cost her party seats in the next election if the Tories brought the gay marriage vote in. Did she listen? Her basic response was "yes, I do agree that we need more outward aggression towards homosexuality". Then she went off to figure why the Tories got hammered by traditional voters: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...-Election-2017 I don't under any circumstances view your having a fetish on the issue - you are not hell bent on shoving it in the face of other people in an entirely antagonistic way what your views are on the matter. (When unsolicited). SF though, along with the likes of Davidson / May etc all seem hell bent on trying their level best to get under the skin of those who do hold traditional views. I honestly don't know what a better word than fetish is, to use. They have some depraved need to seek attention...what word best suits that? It is in no way any reference to someone who may support gay rights though - your average individual will leave it at that. Which is perfectly fine, whichever side you may take.