Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
I had you down as one of the more polite posters capable of reasoned and adult debate, it's not clear as to why this has changed. The way that you have started to speak to people has seriously deteriorated for some inexplicable reason, for example, I found the totally disrespectful way that you recently spoke to a member of admin to be absolutely shocking.
I again confirm that I will not be divulging information of a personal nature as this would not be appropriate, could put third parties at risk of harm and may well be a contempt of court. I cannot understand the motive of anyone trying to bring race into a discussion where it is wholly irrelevant, as opposed to condemning an attempt to fraudently gain £836,000 from the NHS.
My remarks were not an assumption, but are based on facts which you are not privvy to. I only expanded upon them after the reporting of my post led to admin asking me to. I did so in order that you would be reassured that there was no racial element. I say this as a former member of staff of the CRE. In this role I also gave speeches in front of members of the Government, including Lord Mackay, the former Lord Chancellor, who outranked the Prime Minister herself to lobby for better protection for disadvantaged groups.
If you are genuinely interested in this case, I suggest that you follow any further developments reported in the media, but you won't be finding anything out from me. That is assuming that you are not simply baiting/trolling in order to try and stir things up.
Hijacking this thread to try and virtue signal does not help the fight against racial discrimination. It's also a pity that you don't show the same concern for other disadvantaged groups when dealing, for example, with severely disabled people like myself. Perhaps disability doesn't give as many brownie points with the PC culture?
|
You need to get down off that high horse, Richard. Saying how important you are and that you know information that you "cannot share" adds nothing to the debate.
You posted an article relating to a single individual of India ethnicity. No mention of any family let alone of their criminal activity. You then posted a remark mentioning greed in the context of genetics and people. There was only one way to interpret this remark in the context of your thread. I was actually in India at the time so your post was irritating to say the least.
I was not being "PC" or "trolling". I have a number of close friends who are Indian so was angered by your remark.
You then bring in disability into to this thread and accuse me of not showing concern for the disadvantaged. Shame on you.
Enough, let's get this back on topic ...