View Single Post
Old 08-05-2018, 17:42   #29
RichardCoulter
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,797
RichardCoulter is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant View Post
The answer is "it varies". But I think it's all digital these days.


Advanced codecs take longer to encode because they work on many video frames in parallel. The allows them to find common patterns across mutiple frames, and so increase the compression. But the more frames they scan, the more they have to buffer, so the delay increases. It's unlikely to ever get quicker, as this would reduce the compression or compromise picture quality.
You never know, over the years they've managed to increase compression efficiencies on Freeview to squeeze in more channels into the same amount of capacity.

---------- Post added at 16:42 ---------- Previous post was at 16:41 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiskilled View Post
Think I would rather have the extra delay before I find out I had just blown the mortgage payment on the 2:30 at Kempton
Ha ha, wouldn't it be useful if the bookie was using a two minute delayed system and you weren't 🤗
RichardCoulter is offline   Reply With Quote