View Single Post
Old 08-05-2018, 17:35   #27
spiderplant
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,019
spiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny stars
spiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx View Post
That would have made the SD slower so obviously not the case but interested to know how the SD/HD channels are actually done and if it all relies on digital hardware or if any old analogue stuff is used.
The answer is "it varies". But I think it's all digital these days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx View Post
In the future the answer to which is faster could potentially change according to hardware encoding/decoding and broadcasting specs. 4k could potentially get to someone quicker than SD.
Advanced codecs take longer to encode because they work on many video frames in parallel. The allows them to find common patterns across mutiple frames, and so increase the compression. But the more frames they scan, the more they have to buffer, so the delay increases. It's unlikely to ever get quicker, as this would reduce the compression or compromise picture quality.
spiderplant is offline   Reply With Quote