View Single Post
Old 05-05-2018, 08:12   #103
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,781
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Bakers who refused to make 'gay cake' say they felt 'victimised'

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
If selected branches of Subway, KFC, Nandos, and others can (illegally) select Halal only, thereby rejecting bacon, pork and other haram or non-halal meats based upon their faith, then these bakers can be selective about any messages on the cakes.
Not really the same thing. You can choose what you stock but if you offer a service you cannot choose not to offer it to someone based on their religion. I agree it's a different case if you're being compelled to write a message but then if that's what you offer then in this case the court found it counted.

If they sold pre-made cakes which didn't have this message then they would not be breaking the law.

Incidentally calling something illegal doesn't make it illegal. Which is why Subway, KFC, Nandos and others are not in trouble.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote