View Single Post
Old 22-04-2018, 20:36   #29
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: When sky Q over internet begins, will you consider moving from VM?

Completely agree , we are fortunate to receive full speed over Openreach so our 76mb connection would generally be fine as we rarely ever have over 2 Sky boxes watching simultaneously.

The problem comes for those further away who only receive slower speeds. In my opinion Sky is dipping it's toes in the water with this product however I do believe going forward with things such as G.fast more and more will see this as a viable option. Not sure on what timeframe but eventually the dish will go but certainly not in the short term.

I wouldn't say VM users wouldn't have any issues there are areas reported who suffer with peak time congestion.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote