Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
This does point to a worrying lack of backbone in the British public. It's difficult to understand how people can watch those poor children after a chemical attack and not be moved to stop this waste of life.
There are always dangers of getting involved, but if we sit back and do nothing, it's only a matter of time before Putin arrives to break our doors down. He won't knock first, although that might be what we polite British would think was polite.
|
Even if it was a real attack we don't know who did it. Seems strange they would launch a chemical attack knowing the backlash would be - the 'war' is going well for Assad, it doesn't make sense. It could very well have been the rebels themselves/ISIS - they wouldn't think twice about sacrificing their own, they are on the brink of losing. If there's 100% solid proof of responsibility lets see it.
Can't believe we're falling for this again. Syria is a disaster zone, there are no good sides, i've go no answers, but missiles won't help and possibly makes things much much worse for us all. (and why is it always us that has to get involved with the US ? We're a minor nation these days, - where are Ireland, Sweden, Mongolia, Turkey etc etc? Maybe they have too much sense, don't want to waste their time/money and value their own security. Seems like we're so desperate for a trade deal we're currying favour with Donald at any cost.
As for the Russians - sanctions are hitting them big time. Hit them with lots more; money hurts them most.