|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
From my earlier link
Quote:
A spokesperson for Facebook told ThinkProgress that the company regrets the way it communicated with Diamond and Silk, particularly the email in which they were told their content was “unsafe.” The Facebook spokesperson added that changes to Facebook’s monetization policies, implemented in September 2017, were not properly communicated to Diamond and Silk and may have added to the confusion.
Facebook’s spokesperson, however, categorically denied that any page, including Diamond and Silk, was targeted or penalized due to their political beliefs. Rather, any changes to their page performance over the last few months were not targeted at them, but the result of broader shifts across Facebook.
Indeed, many pages, including liberal pages, have suffered large declines because Facebook has reduced the distribution of videos and other content published by pages in favor of content from “friends and family.”
Diamond and Silk, however, have seen their total interactions increase slightly because the reach of their video content has more than replaced status updates that include links.
|
They were sent a note saying their “content and brand” were “unsafe to the community" this was later reversed - their page wasn’t banned.
They could still post to their page, they, and others, were not blocked from accessing it - how were they banned?
Even the pair haven't said they were banned - they said on Fox News
Quote:
|
they noticed reduced engagement on their page for months and received a note from the social media company about their content last week.
|
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 13-04-2018 at 08:12.
|