Thread: Government & Post Election Discussion
View Single Post
Old 29-03-2018, 16:16   #1258
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,085
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
As others have said, you are doing far, far more than you need to. Having some lateral thoughts like those I've suggested will save you a ton of money.
To consider it another way, how many councils, organisations or companies have contacted you to inform you of their privacy policies?
The larger companies probably don't rely so much on the 'consent' justification, have web sites and a great deal of in house expertise on data protection.

Smaller organisations have not previously been covered by the data protection regime and normally do rely on consent to gather their data, which is often only names and addresses.

I still say, however, that whatever you say about this, there are better ways of passing laws that should not need to require a level of organisational bureaucracy to enforce.
OLD BOY is offline