Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
So the ‘insurance policy’ text means nothing?
Text messages between a certain date go missing and the last date they start up again is the same day Robert Mueller is appointed Special Counsel.
Come off it Damien. Jeez.  |
Well the texts have been found so let's see what there is. We know of at least one 'shocking' revelation that on reveal of the messages where a joke.
And I have not said that these two agents didn't do anything. I have said they should be investigated. If that investigation then leads to other people being taken down so be it. However I haven't seen anything yet that escalates this story beyond the two people involved. Having a test message that talks of a 'insurance policy' means nothing in isolation. Maybe their 'insurance policy' was that the bung £100 on a Trump win to cash in? That was my insurance policy.
It's also possible for two things to be true: People in Trump's camp were up to no good and some people in the FBI were up to no good. Investigate possible crimes amongst the Democrats, Republicans and FBI if there is evidence to do so.
I didn't call the New York Times fake news when they broke the story about Clinton's e-mails. If there is a case then investigate it.
---------- Post added at 13:27 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
I wouldn’t trust Comey, he is unreliable, just look at text messages saying AG, Loretta Lynch knew what Comey was going to announce but pretended otherwise and she told him not to call it an investigation, call it a matter, he got a queasy feeling, but said it wasn’t a hill worth dying on and went along with what she told him to say, but she was wrong to do that.
|
His testimony wouldn't be enough. If Muller comes out and this entire case is 'Corney told me so' then yes this is a nothing story.