Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
What part of 'They were fired' did you not understand ? So they were NO longer on his pay roll ?
Are you telling me people who hire people with criminal liabilities are tainted ?
|
And nor was Steele employed by the Democrats today. If the Democrats are tainted because somebody they
had paid has been charged for lying why isn't Trump tainted because somebody he
had paid has been 'referred' for lying?
Quote:
There is no double standards because there is no evidence of Trump paying anybody to get dirt on Hillary, unless you know something the rest of us and Congress and Robert Mueller himself doesn't ?
However, there is documented evidence the Democratic National Committee party did, along with Crooked Hillary, pay in to the coffers of Fusion GPS, for the Russian Dossier on Trump during the 2016 Election.
|
This alleged crime, we know little about so far, isn't to do with the fact he made the dossier but that is accused of lying to someone somewhere (presumably under oath or to the FBI).
I think if he has committed a crime then he should be invested/charged. If that implicates Clinton or someone else at the DNC they should be charged too. It's little to do with me.
But if you think the Democrats are tainted by this because they had employed him then I can't see why Trump isn't tainted because he had employed Flynn. You believe every accusation levelled against Clinton and none of them against Trump., even when those accusations are very similar.