View Single Post
Old 14-12-2017, 08:37   #1280
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,270
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Brexit discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Can someone explain why it’s wrong for MPs to have a vote on the actual legislation that will be produced after negotiations on leaving the EU, and why it’s right for MPs to have a vote on the laws and statutes produced when the Government (of any party) tries to introduce/change any other legislation?

In both cases, a majority of voters (whether it’s a General Election or a Referendum) have indicated they want something to happen - either to Leave the EU or in support of a Party Manifesto.
I think some of the extreme Brexiters fear Parliamentary scrutiny will reduce the chances of a hard Brexit. It's not a philosophical question for them.
1andrew1 is offline