Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
Going off topic a little for a minute, what Mick said above is why I think Trump actually has no evidence of any wrongdoing on Hillary's part, despite his protestations to the contrary. If he presented any evidence to the US government, she would be charged within hours, simply because the Republicans control congress, the executive branch and the supreme court. Even if she had not been charged in the first few hours, he has had 10 months to produce any evidence, she would have been charged (and possibly convicted) by now.
Regarding the Mueller investigation, I think there are links to the Trump campaign, and I think that has been proved. What I don't think has been proved yet (and I think it will, but in time) is if any of those links end at Trump himself, or his family.
It is important to remember that while Trump was in charge of the campaign, and ultimately benefited, he is not automatically responsible if his staff commit crimes without him being aware.
|
It is not up to Trump to present evidence on Hillary, there is strong indications being reported and in Washington Post, which is Anti-Trump, that going off financial transactions that the Podesta Company (Hillary’s Campaign Team) and the DNC paid for the Fake Russian Dossier on Trump. Many legal commentators say Hillary should be worried.
As for last part of your post. When Trump became aware of Manaforts ties to Russian counterparts, he severed ties by firing him. Which could be the wisest decision that saves him.