Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Seems there's a different standard of proof/evidence required for some depending on whether it's Trump (always innocent, all evidence is 'fake'), or Clinton (always guilty, no matter what the 'fake' facts say...)  |
It seems like Clinton is guilty until proven innocent and Trump innocent until proven guilty. For example, we've seen how a war widow couldn't possibly be correct when discussing the muti-witnessed phone call from Donald Trump yet when the Benghazi mother said Hillary Clinton lied she was obviously correct.
And when it comes to challenging Trump's lack of legislative achievements all I hear is something that most VM customers are well used to hearing.
Coming soon!