Thread: Controversial bag charge a success as shoppers will use 6 billion fewer plastic bags
View Single Post
Old 07-08-2017, 22:20   #56
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,200
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Controversial bag charge a success as shoppers will use 6 billion fewer plastic b
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M View Post
People dont carry "bags for life" around with them on the off chance they might pop into a shop. Its just a way to make more money of such people.
Except that the profit goes to charity not to the shop.
We keep a few bags in the car just in case, although it's a petrol car, not electric.

---------- Post added at 22:20 ---------- Previous post was at 22:18 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K View Post
Men are at a disadvantage as far as bags are concerned. Women have handbags in which they keep God knows what, and a extra sneaky bag or 2. Men just have pockets which are already full wallet/keys/phone. The 5p charge is sexual discrimination. ( the exception is those blokes with 'man' bags, but they're just weird....)
Rucksacks are the male equivalent of handbags for the moment and you can get plenty of bags for life in one.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote