Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
The New York Times, has arrogantly defended it's decision to publish photographs of dead bodies on the floor of Manchester Arena and the fragments of what was left of the Bomb.
This is their Statement:
|
Maybe they just ought to just respect what the security services tasked with picking up the pieces are asking of them for a
few more hours or is getting that breaking news scoop/picture published ahead of their rivals the most important thing? Are they really saying that 'educating their readership' is that important and couldn't have waited a short time?
