Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Personally i would prefer a leader who would at least think of pushing the button if it was needed. Labour would just role over and give in by the sounds of it.
|
It probably is better to say nothing
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Well, faced with an imminent nuclear attack, which was the question put by Piers Morgan, how wouldn't it? Delay = annihilation.
Anyway, the fundamental reason for having nukes, which the likes of Corbyn don't seem to understand, is to prevent a nuclear attack. By telling everyone that although we have this arsenal we will never use it, this is tantamount to actually inviting an attack on this country.
Simple logic, really.
|
No not really that simple, no one is queuing up to attack us, the real reason we have these weapons is so the likes of Dave and bliar can show of on the world stage and act like they actually belong on the top table. It was a rediculous question that deserved to be ignored or even better rebuked, what make believe scenario is being envisaged, a massive world war in which our nukes will make no difference to and just make us a target or is he thinking it'll be some nutter like kim Jong silly hair in which case do we need nuclear weapons to take care of him, no we don't or else we would've used them 60 years ago on his grand daddy.
---------- Post added at 01:46 ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
We all know Corbyn is a unelectable idiot but May ain't that much better either IMO.  |
I don't like her silence on most subjects, imo it isn't a sign of strength but a sign of someone wanting to deny things they don't like or pass the buck