View Single Post
Old 28-12-2016, 22:24   #47
Ramrod
Inactive
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 58
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Voters will have to show ID

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
So despite oodles of voter fraud and constituency boundaries biased towards Labour they still couldn't win a one horse race .....awsome
Yep. They really are that rubbish

---------- Post added at 23:21 ---------- Previous post was at 23:17 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
How much fraud is actually there? I am not convinced this is a massive issue. I know it can be as we saw in Tower Hamlets but isolated incidents aren't evidence of it being a widespread problem.
Any fraud is too much, imo, and should be stamped out.

---------- Post added at 23:24 ---------- Previous post was at 23:21 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post

So what evidence is there of such systematic fraud?
link
As I've already posted:
Quote:
In 2014 the Electoral Commission published a report which singled out 16 local authority areas where it believed voter fraud to be especially prevalent. They were: Birmingham, Bradford, Calderdale, Derby, Kirklees, Pendle, Slough, Walsall, Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Coventry, Hyndburn, Oldham, Peterborough, Tower Hamlets and Woking.
I dunno. Is 16 local authority areas 'systematic'?
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote