Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Do you seriously believe that city corporations, private citizens and foreign UK residents like Gina Miller who nobody had previously ever heard of, are suddenly such passionate defenders of the Westminster model of democracy that they're prepared to chuck great piles of their own money at "defending" it? Why do you think Miller demanded the government accept the ruling at the high court and not appeal to the Supreme Court? Because the real truth is, she doesn't give two short smegs for our constitutional arrangements and doesn't understand that once the balance of power between Crown and Parliament has been challenged, history itself demands that it be settled at the highest level. Instead, she dim-wittedly suggested that the government should be "honourable" and not pursue an appeal. The base ignorance of it from someone who took it upon herself to challenge the very basis of the British constitution is shocking.
That balance is at the very heart of what Britain is. Families in these islands shed each others' blood over it. That makes this Supreme Court case very necessary and important, without altering the fact that the process was triggered by bad motives the plaintiffs have not had the courage to own up to.
Of course this court case isn't going to prevent the UK leaving; of course that is not its stated aim. The whole point of this action, and others like it (there is a ludicrous attempt in the courts of the Irish Republic at the moment, trying to engineer a way for the ECJ to have its say on the process) is to delay Brexit for as long as possible, in the hope the country will go to hell in a handcart in the meantime. Arch-remainers know they can't openly demand a referendum re-run right now, but if the polls shift dramatically then they will have the pretext they're hoping for.
Delay, delay, delay and hope something turns up. That's what it's all about.
|
Theresa May has confirmed that the Article 50 challenge hasn't delayed anything so what's the big deal?
Gina Miller is not a "foreign UK resident". Where do you get this idea come from? I fear it has influenced your interpretation of her motives somewhat. She is British and was born in a British Commonwealth country, British Guiana which is now called Guyana and grew up in England. She has battled many issues including fund management charges in the public interest and this is another issue she feels strongly about. She and her husband have been major contributors to the Margaret Thatcher infirmary at the Royal Hospital Chelsea. The fact that you have not heard of her before is irrelevant.
---------- Post added at 09:25 ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod
lol! Are you asking that with a straight face?  |
Yes but not to your good self, to Old Boy.
I fear that your views are as per the quote from Stephen Philips that I posted recently, "The leavers, you might imagine, would be brimming with seasonal good cheer. For some, this is the culmination of a life’s political work. They should be dancing in the streets. Instead, gripped by a fear that verges on paranoia, they see dark plots and dastardly conspiracies in every doorway."